Dual Camera Alignment#
Why is this necessary?#
Images on the two cameras will not be perfectly registered and will require an affine transformation.
To determine the location-dependent deviation, we need to image something that can be seen in each channel.
Bead slide vs using spinning disk pinholes#
Previously, we used a multi-color TetraSpeck bead slide, but this has some downsides:
- Weak fluorescence and poor photostability → Annoying to use when doing coarse alignment
 - Uneven bead distribution → can take time to find a good bead region
 - New slides need to be made monthly → Extra effort
 
However, our 60x and 100x objectives are excellent and exhibit less than 100nm axial chromatic shift within the green, red, and far-red channels at 37C--far below the axial resolution of our scope. With this in mind, stopping the spinning disk's rotation and using transmitted light is a good and easy alternative.
Aligning with spinning disk pinholes#
YouTube videos for aligning with pinholes
Aligning with TetraSpeck beads#
- Focus onto TetraSpeck beads, enable PFS, and start a timelapse for about 30 minutes
 - 30 minutes should be sufficient for temperatures to stabilize (as evidenced by no more drifting)
 -  Load the relevant two-color OC (e.g. 
align-488-561) - Go Live and inspect the overlap of the 488 and 561 channels
 
Note
- Aim for perfect overlap in the center of the ROI
 - The chromatic aberration will get worse at the edges of the FOV
 
- If adjustments need to be made, use the 1.5mm hex screw. Translate the 488 channel by tweaking "H" and "V"1.
 
Tip
- Compensate for the slight movement as you remove the hex screw.
 
- When satisfied, acquire a multi-channel z-stack of the beads in order to align channels later. Make sure the beads are well distributed and extend to the edges of your FOV.
 
- 
Rotating the DM here leads to lateral translatation ↩